Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts

Monday, February 24, 2014

Samsung Galaxy S5 vs S4: New Features

Samsung Galaxy S5 vs S4: New Features
Samsung has announced the Galaxy S5, the successor to the Galaxy S4, during its Unpacked5 event at Mobile World Conference 2014 in Barcelona. After all the rumors and leaks, Samsung has finally unveiled its fifth flagship smartphone to take on Apple and Microsoft, as well as the many other Android OEMs.
Before you run out and buy the latest and greatest from the South Korean company, assuming you’re not interested in iOS or Windows Phone, you might want to check what exactly you’re getting for your hard-earned cash. We’ve put together the following table to show you what exactly Samsung has changed between the S4 and the S5.
Galaxy S4Galaxy S5
Storage16GB, 32GB, 64GB16GB, 32GB
Display5-inch, 1920×1080, 441 ppi5.1-inch, 1920×1080, 432 ppi
Processor1.9 GHz Quad-Core / 1.6 GHz Octa-Core2.5GHz Quad-Core
Memory2GB RAM2GB RAM
Rear Camera13MP16MP
Front Camera2MP2.1MP
Battery2,600 mAh2,800 mAh
Network4G LTE Cat 3 100/50Mbps4G LTE Cat.4 150/50Mbps
ConnectivityUSB 2.0, Bluetooth 4.0, NFCUSB 3.0, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC
Height5.38 inches (136.6 mm)5.59 inches (142.0 mm)
Width2.75 inches (69.8 mm)2.85 inches (72.5 mm)
Depth0.31 inches (7.9 mm)0.32 inches (8.1 mm)
Weight4.59 ounces (130 g)5.11 ounces (145 g)
ColorsWhite/Black/Blue/Brown/Purple/Red/PinkWhite/Black/Blue/Gold
OSAndroid 4.2 (Jelly Bean)Android 4.4 (KitKat)

Given that the Samsung Galaxy S5 is expected to be priced similarly to the Samsung Galaxy S4, you’re essentially paying for a heavier, bigger, and more powerful device. The Galaxy S5 will arrive via Samsung’s retail channels and at carriers in April. Will you be getting one?

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Firefox vs Chrome: Browser Review by Lifehacker Readers

Chrome Is More Polished, Firefox Is More Customizable
Google put a lot of work into making Chrome look nice and feel more polished than your average browser. As a result, you get a great experience out of the box. Firefox, on the other hand, offers a lot of control over how it looks and operates. While many people made this argument, our own Whitson Gordon summed it up most concisely
Chrome is a much more polished browser. It's smoother, it feels faster, and it's got a lot of cool extra features like application shortcuts and packaged apps. It is, without a doubt, the browser I'd recommend to most people, and it feels like a more mature browser despite the fact that it's older.
Firefox, though, still beats it in level of customization. It may be a little slower and clunkier, but with things like about:config you can really tweak every tiny corner to your heart's content (here are some of my favorite tweaks), which is pretty killer. It may not have as many big features, but the features it does have you can configure to the tiniest detail. And if you're a person that likes things just so, that's hard to give up
In a way, it's like the iOS versus Android argument. Chrome, like iOS, has its limitations—just far fewer of them. Firefox, on the other hand, will let you do almost whatever you want.P

Chrome Is Better for Developers

Developers tend to use Chrome. Why? Perhaps because Google employs many of them. Reader dougoftheabaci has another theory:
I could go on, I truly could, but there is no doubt in my mind which is superior. I would even gladly speak for all the developers I work with (about 20 or so) who all use Chrome as their primary. In fact, most devs and designers I know use Chrome as their primary browser, both for personal use and for testing and development. Why? The same reason chefs always have the best kitchens: We know what's the best and we don't want to use anything else.P
Of course, you as a developer you kind of have to use multiple browsers. As a primary, however, Chrome tends to win out but whether or not that's because it's the best is a matter of opinion. It is more popular in general, however, so Chrome would have to be significantly worse for developers if Firefox were to take the lead with that specific group.P

Firefox Has Better Extensions

Chrome has a lot of extensions, but some users feel Firefox has better, more capable ones. Reader missem falls into this camp:
Firefox wins on extensions, privacy and security. Chrome wins on simplicity and smoothness. However FF is working on both simplicity (australis) and smoothness (electrolysis) for next year. That said, they are more equal then many realize. FF favors the power user with many tabs and extensions. Chrome favors the average user with only a couple of tabs open and no extensions.
While others still look at Chrome very much as a browser for power users as well, Firefox (as noted earlier) offers more fine-grain control.

Chrome Offers Better Syncing Capabilities

Chrome syncs just about everything you do in the browser so you can log in on one computer or mobile device and essentially pick up where you left off. Of course, you have to use Chrome everywhere to have this benefit. Vrekk argues this point:
Chrome for Android syncs together well with the desktop and is just plain fast. (Not saying Firefox isn't though). Now I will say I tried Firefox for android the other day, and I loved it there. Really fast and plugins made things like lastpass a lot more usable on mobile where it is kinda impossible to use with Chrome. But the Desktop version of firefox can't match the Desktop version of Chrome, and because of all the sync features I use Chrome on both.
Cfc responds that Firefox handles this just as well:
Firefox syncs across my desktop and my Android device, just like Chrome would. Likewise, with the default configuration, Firefox will automatically update itself — again, just like Chrome does. The two are nearly identical on the vast majority of features.
So while people generally feel Chrome handles sync better, others find both browsers to be evenly matched.

Firefox Offers Better Privacy

According to reader missem, Firefox wins on both user privacy and security. Let's start with the privacy argument:
FF does not make money of user data. They go to such pains to protect their users that I think seeing how both Chrome and FF are both good browsers, this issue alone should be enough to drive people into Mozilla's arms.
And now, security:
I think that out of the box Chrome is likely to be very slightly more secure then FF due to its sandboxing model (which is why Chrome is also worse in memory usage). That said, FF's security extensions are so powerful that overall I think FF is superior in this category. Adblock plus, No Script, Ghostery, pdf.js and soon Shumway will lock your browser down like Fort Knox. But for inexperienced users who don't want to customize there can be slight benefits to using Chrome.
Furthermore, Chrome has an insecure password manager and you should use a third-party option instead. Overall, it's hard to argue against these points. Google does have something to gain by collecting data about you whereas Firefox does not—on the surface, at least. With third-party extensions—which Mozilla doesn't intend to lock down to prevent installations from outside of their own site—you can do a lot more to stay secure. If either of these things matter to you greatly, you may prefer Firefox.

Chrome Crashes More—No, Firefox Does!

Depending on who you ask, both browsers crash a lot. Let's start with TiredOfHypocrites:
I tend to have lots of tabs open, and leave them open. I went from Firefox to Chrome, and now back to Firefox. The reason? Chrome eats up far more memory for the same amount of tabs than Firefox. Also, Firefox would always recover the previous session if it crashes; Chrome on the other hand, has failed multiples times.
Henry Floyd disagrees:
I have had the exact opposite experience. Firefox eats up an obscene amount of memory, to the point where it becomes nearly unusable. Chrome has never done that to me.
Rguitargod suggests a Chrome extension to solve the problem:
I use a Chrome extension called The Great Suspender that automatically suspends tabs after a set amount of time (I think default is 15 minutes)... So the tabs are still there, but they're not using any memory.
For the record, I'm a big fan. I think it helps a lot. TiredOfHypocrites doesn't:
I conduct a lot of media research, and a lot of times a single site will lead me to 10 others. I keep them open for faster access when I need to find a specific image. Yes, I do need more organization, but for the time being Firefox is working out well for me at least.P
So what's the takeaway? Both browsers have their issues if you open a bunch of stuff in them, especially on a lower-powered computer like a laptop. The solution isn't really switching browsers, but managing your tabs more effectively. Close more and use an extension like The Great Suspender to help out if needed.

Both Are Not Internet Explorer 6

Remember Internet Explorer 6 (IE6)? Some of you don't have to because you still have to use it at the office. It failed to work with most web sites since the day it came out, and while later versions of Internet Explorer have improved you don't see too many people using them. Firefox and Chrome both offer significantly better experiences for those who want to do more with the web (and, I think, in general as well). So you could be—and in some cases, may still be—stuck with Microsoft's beast that just won't die (even though they officially killed it and a funeral was held in celebration). Whether you prefer Chrome or Firefox for the little things one does better than the other, just remember how bad things used to be and cherish the modern browser you've got.




Monday, May 20, 2013

Iphone 6 Concept


If you've long complained about your typing speed and productivity, this iPhone 6 concept video may be the solution you're searching for.
The above YouTube video shows an iPhone 6 mockup that, when set on a flat surface, can project a Mac keyboard from one side and a Mac desktop from the other.
The video, created by YouTube user Sonitdac, shows a rendered "iPhone 6" that looks sim,ilar to an iPhone 5. The top and bottom ends of the iPhone are shown snapping off to create a stand for a small degree of elevation.
The iPhone rendering then projected a keyboard and trackpad onto the desk in front of the phone, and a functional Mac cinema display onto the wall.
While the rendering is clearly a pipe dream created by a clever animator, it's an interesting — though completely unlikely — concept video.
As for the real next iPhone, Apple isn't expected to make an announcement on that for some time, though it could come at next month's World Wide Developer's Conference, which will have its keynote June 10.
Originally posted on Mashable

Friday, October 26, 2012

Windows 8 new features


Windows 8 is revolutionizing the PC industry with an interface that diverges greatly from something we’ve all grown quite accustomed to. For better or worse, Microsoft is forcing its users toward the mobile way of viewing things. While this has given way to much criticism, there are countless benefits that can be seen from this mobile push, interface notwithstanding. Here are several important features of the new Windows 8 operating system.
UEFI Replaces BIOS
For those of you who know what BIOS is, this will be a much-needed change. Microsoft has created a new boot solution called Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI), which will significantly improve the boot process and user experience, replacing the older archaic Basic Input Output System (BIOS) that we’ve been stuck with for decades.
With Windows 8 has come faster boot times of around eight second between pushing the power button and windows opening. This, along with the need for fewer system reboots, will help increase productivity in the office.
UEFI is not only more user-friendly, but comes equipped with several new and handy features. Secure boot prevents unauthorized operating systems from loading, and Early Launch Anti-Malware (ELAM) protects against boot loader attacks. It is also quite IT-friendly and allows administrators to perform remote diagnostics and computer repairs via the network.
Full Windows Experience on Tablets
Most tablets don’t have the processing capacity to run a full PC-based operating system. Windows 8 seeks to change that by allowing x86-based tablets the opportunity to retain much of the productivity allowed by Windows 8. Rather than using an environment that is toned down and more restricted, you can use the full Windows environment. This means you can still use the same Windows applications from Microsoft Office 2013 to countless more desktop-based applications.
This benefit only applies to x86-based tablets that are loaded with Windows 8 Pro. Tablets with ARM processors that run Windows Run Time (RT) will unfortunately only support the Metro-style apps and won’t offer the full Windows experience.
Windows To Go
This is a feature we’ve all been wanting for countless years (some of us anyway). The Windows To Go feature in Windows 8 Enterprise allows users to put a clean install of Windows 8 onto a 32GB or higher USB thumb or portable drive and boot it from other computers. This is especially helpful for individuals who are telecommuters or temporary contractors as you can fit an entire PC operating system loaded with all the needed applications, settings and files onto a device small enough to fit in your pocket.
You can also use this feature to create a backup operating system in the event that your computer becomes infected or corrupted. To protect against theft, you can encrypt your device with BitLocker.
New Recovery Options
We all dread that moment when the “blue screen of death” appears and we’re forced to recover or reinstall Windows. Windows 8 offers two new options, Refresh and Reset, which will help save you countless hours in reconstructing the PC’s environment. You can initiate these options through the Metro-style Settings app within Windows or via the new boot Windows Recovery Environment.
Refresh keeps all of your personal data, apps and settings, but reinstalls Windows. This entire process can take less than 10 minutes regardless of how much personal data needs to be backed up. Reset removes all data on the computer and reinstalls Windows to the same condition it was in the first time it started. This can take between 10 and 25 minutes, a far cry from the several hours that older Windows environments took to install.

Sunday, June 24, 2012

2012 Review:Top 5 best Internet Browsers


An internet browser the   application that allows you to access online content such as text, videos, images and audio clips on websites. The browser locates and retrieves webpages of different websites. Example of most popular internet browsers include; Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Internet Explorer among others. They also interpret hyperlinks that allow you to travel to different webpages when clicked on. While internet browsers are primarily intended to access the internet, they can also be used to access private information on web servers or through file systems.

Before we get down to the top five list let us find out what we need to look for or simply the selection criteria.
Feature Set – A web browser should provide practical, convenient features that make surfing the web easy and fast. For instance, a browser should offer tabbed browsing, a customizable toolbar and an integrated search engine. For a more personalized web experience, the browser should also provide the ability to save bookmarks, set parental controls and create RSS feeds. Generally speaking, the more features an internet browser provides, the better.
Security – While online security measures have come a long way since the inception of the internet, the web is still rife with security risks, namely small-scale attacks to hack electronic data. Security features such as privacy settings, a pop-up blocker and antispyware enable safe internet surfing and help keep personal information such as passwords secure.
Speed & Compatibility – Web browsers should load quickly and be compatible with all major operating systems. We tested the speed of each browser in our lineup using the same Windows 7 system and a stopwatch, timing how quickly each one initially started up and was able to navigate between websites. A top internet browser will load and navigate between pages within just a few seconds.
Ease of Use – The best internet browsers are those that strike a seamless balance between features and ease of use. While features on a web browser are important, they become worthless if a browser’s interface hinders your ability to utilize them. Web browsers should boast an intuitive layout that fosters easy and convenient navigation.
Help & Support – Although some internet browsers are open source and therefore not supplemented with dedicated technical support, we still considered the quality of support options available. When it comes to internet browsers, available support can come in many forms, ranging from FAQs to tutorials, email support to a product manual.



According to Top Ten Reviews (TTR): a website which aggregates reviews for software, hardware, web services, music, movies and video games from other sites and publications, the list is as follows;
  1. Google Chrome
  2. Mozilla Firefox
  3. Internet Explorer
  4. Opera Mini
  5. Safari
For a complete and detailed review visit TTR

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Windows 8 Consumer Preview Released to the Public







The Windows 8 Consumer Preview has been officially released in both 32 and 64-bit versions for multiple languages.  You can find them located at http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/iso.
So far the supported languages include:
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • French
  • German
The system requirements are said to work the same as Windows 7, and at first glance they do appear to be extremely similar.
  • Processor: 1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster
  • RAM: 1 gigabyte (GB) (32-bit) or 2 GB (64-bit)
  • Hard disk space: 16 GB (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit)
  • Graphics card: Microsoft DirectX 9 graphics device or higher
  • To use touch, you need a tablet or monitor that supports multitouch
  • To access Windows Store and to download and run apps, you need an active Internet connection and a screen resolution of at least 1024 x 768
  • To snap apps, you need a screen resolution of at least 1366 x 768
Microsoft has written out the directions on how to get this up and running on your system.
The easiest way to convert an ISO file to a DVD in Windows 7 is to use Windows Disc Image Burner. On a PC running Windows XP or Windows Vista, a third-party program is required to convert an ISO file into installable media—and DVD burning software often includes this capability. One option is the USB/DVD download tool provided by the Microsoft Store. You can also download Windows 8 Consumer Preview Setup, which includes tools that allow you to create a DVD or USB flash drive from an ISO file (Windows Vista or Windows 7 required).
If you get this installed today, make sure to leave us a comment and let us know what you think of this first look at the future of Windows!

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Smartphone Wars



Booming demand for the latest iPhone model helped Apple beat all phones using Google's Android platform in the U.S. smartphone market in the fourth quarter, data showed on Wednesday.
Research firm Kantar Worldpanel ComTech said Apple's share of the U.S. market doubled from a year ago to 44.9 percent in the October to December period, just beating Google's Android smartphones, which slipped to 44.8 percent from 50 percent.
Late on Tuesday Apple reported quarterly results which blew past Wall Street's expectations after consumers snapped up near-unprecedented numbers of iPhones and iPads, sending its shares up 8 percent and into record territory.
In stark contrast sales of handset makers using Android, including Motorola Mobility, HTC and Sony Ericsson , have stumbled in the quarter.
"Apple has continued its strong sales run in the U.S., UK and Australia over the Christmas period," Dominic Sunnebo, global consumer insight director at the research firm said.
"Overall, Apple sales are now growing at a faster rate than Android across the nine countries we cover," Sunnebo added.
Kantar said Microsoft's Windows Phone share in all of the nine key markets it measures remained at less than 2 percent despite the high-profile launch of the Lumia range from Nokia.
Nokia's flagship Lumia 800 model failed to break into top 10 smartphones sold in Britain by the end of the fourth quarter, the researcher said.
Nokia said in November the model was off to an excellent start in Britain, and had seen the best ever first week of Nokia smartphone sales in the UK in recent history.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Kasperky: 2011's best antivirus


Throughout the year AV-Comparatives.org tests security products in a variety of ways. Each product that passes a test receives at least a STANDARD rating. Those that perform better than most but still have areas needing work get an ADVANCED rating, and the very best receive the rating ADVANCED+. At the end of the year, the company reports on all tests and names a product of the year. This year Kaspersky took that honor.




How They Test
In the on-demand test researchers scan hundreds of thousands of malware samples and note what percentage each product eliminates. The retrospective test is similar, but by forcing each product to use old virus definitions it emulates proactive detection of zero-day threats. The whole product dynamic test challenges each product to resist infection by hundreds of active threats over a period of weeks. The performance test measures how much impact each product has on system performance.
AV-Comparatives runs those four tests twice each year. This year saw the introduction of a new removal test. Researchers gathered a collection of threats that had been detected by every tested product for at least six months and then challenged each product to fully remove those threats. The chart below shows all results from last year.

In this chart ADV+, ADV, and STD stand for ADVANCED+, ADVANCED, and STANDARD. An empty cell indicates that the product was tested but failed to reach the STANDARD level. A black cell with "n/a" in white letters simply means AV-Comparatives didn't test that particular product. In a grey box, "n/a" means the vendor actively choose to abstain from the test.
Why would anyone abstain? A number of vendors believe that the retrospective test doesn't accurately reflect their product's capabilities. You can figure out which ones from the chart.
Kudos to Kaspersky
Although the raw test scores may differ, the test reports advise that all products with the same rating should be treated as equivalent. To this end, the researchers use a clustering technique rather than predefining hard cut-offs for each rating level.
For selecting the product of the year, researchers look for the greatest number of ADVANCED+ ratings. This year there was a single clear winner. Kaspersky aced every single test. The 2010 winner, F-Secure, missed by just one score of ADVANCED rather than ADVANCED+.
Any product that earned at least five ADVANCED+ ratings is designated a top rated product. Besides Kaspersky, Avira, Bitdefender, ESET, and F-Secure  earned this honor.
I should point out that the Webroot product tested here is completely different from PCMag Editors' Choice Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus. The report states, "It is very possible that Webroot's results in future tests will improve as a result of the new engine." Norton, our other Editors' Choice, was named product of the year for 2009. It didn't get top ratings in 2011, but did score a win specifically for effective malware removal and low performance impact.
The full report lists winners in a number of specific categories including malware detection, scanning speed, and low false positives. You'll also find a useful and informative report on the process of installing and using each product, with screenshots.


 

© 2013 techfollower. All rights resevered. Designed by Templateism

Back To Top
Domains for £0.99 only first year